Shared Governance  ›  Demographic Analysis

* For help understanding this visualization, see "Guide" tab.
* To see the full name of column header, hover pointer over short name in external comparison column header.
 
 
Your results compared to PEERS   ◄
Your results compared to COHORT ►
Areas of strength in GREEN
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
tenured
pre-ten
ntt
full
assoc
men
women
white
foc
asian
urm
ten vs pre-ten
ten vs ntt
full vs assoc
men vs women
white vs foc
white vs asian
white vs urm
change over time
Governance: Trust
3.14
N<5
tenured
tenured
N<5
women
white
white
white
N/A
I understand how to voice opinions about policies
3.42
N<5
tenured
tenured
N<5
men
white
white
white
N/A
Clear rules about the roles of faculty and administration
3.14
N<5
 
tenured
N<5
women
white
white
N/A
Faculty and admin follow rules of engagement
3.08
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
women
white
N<5
white
N/A
Faculty and admin have an open system of communication
2.91
N<5
N<5
tenured
N<5
N<5
 
white
white
white
N/A
Faculty and admin discuss difficult issues in good faith
3.16
N<5
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
N<5
women
 
white
urm
N/A
Governance: Shared Sense of Purpose
3.19
N<5
N<5
tenured
N<5
N<5
women
white
 
white
N/A
Important decisions are not made until there is consensus
2.70
N<5
N<5
N<5
tenured
N<5
N<5
women
white
N<5
white
N/A
Admin ensures sufficient time for faculty input
2.97
N<5
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
N<5
women
 
asian
white
N/A
Faculty and admin respectfully consider the other's view
3.00
N<5
N<5
 
N<5
N<5
women
foc
asian
urm
N/A
Faculty and admin have a shared sense of responsibility
3.86
N<5
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
N<5
 
foc
asian
 
N/A
Governance: Understanding the Issue at Hand
3.11
N<5
tenured
 
N<5
 
white
white
white
N/A
Faculty governance structures offer opportunities for input
3.69
N<5
tenured
tenured
N<5
 
white
white
white
N/A
Admin communicate rationale for important decisions
2.89
N<5
N<5
tenured
N<5
N<5
 
white
 
white
N/A
Faculty and admin have equal say in decisions
2.97
N<5
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
N<5
men
 
urm
N/A
Faculty and admin define decision criteria together
2.87
N<5
N<5
tenured
N<5
N<5
 
foc
asian
urm
N/A
Governance: Adaptability
3.27
N<5
tenured
 
N<5
 
foc
 
urm
N/A
Shared governance holds up in unusual circumstances
3.29
N<5
N<5
tenured
N<5
N<5
men
 
white
 
N/A
Institution regularly reviews effectiveness of governance
3.20
N<5
tenured
tenured
N<5
women
foc
asian
urm
N/A
Institution cultivates new faculty leaders
3.30
N<5
 
ntt
N<5
 
foc
 
urm
N/A
Governance: Productivity
3.55
N<5
tenured
ntt
N<5
men
white
asian
white
N/A
Overall effectiveness of shared governance
3.68
N<5
N<5
tenured
N<5
N<5
men
 
 
 
N/A
My committees make measureable progress towards goals
3.66
N<5
pre-ten
ntt
N<5
 
foc
asian
 
N/A
Public recognition of progress
3.41
N<5
 
ntt
N<5
men
white
asian
white
N/A