Departmental Engagement, Quality, and Collegiality  ›  Demographic Analysis

* For help understanding this visualization, see "Guide" tab.
* To see the full name of column header, hover pointer over short name in external comparison column header.
 
 
Your results compared to PEERS   ◄
Your results compared to COHORT ►
Areas of strength in GREEN
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
tenured
pre-ten
ntt
full
assoc
men
women
white
foc
asian
urm
ten vs pre-ten
ten vs ntt
full vs assoc
men vs women
white vs foc
white vs asian
white vs urm
change over time
Departmental Collegiality
3.89
N<5
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
N<5
men
white
 
white
N/A
Colleagues support work/life balance
3.69
N<5
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
N<5
women
white
white
white
N/A
Meeting times compatible with personal needs
3.50
N<5
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
N<5
women
white
white
white
N/A
Amount of personal interaction w/Pre-tenure
3.80
N<5
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
N<5
men
 
asian
white
N/A
How well you fit
3.81
N<5
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
N<5
men
white
asian
white
N/A
Amount of personal interaction w/Tenured
3.77
N<5
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
N<5
men
white
asian
white
N/A
Colleagues pitch in when needed
4.17
N<5
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
N<5
men
white
white
white
N/A
Department is collegial
4.25
N<5
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
N<5
men
white
white
white
N/A
Colleagues committed to diversity/inclusion
4.25
N<5
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
N<5
women
 
asian
white
N/A
Departmental Engagement
3.96
N<5
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
N<5
men
foc
asian
white
N/A
Discussions of undergrad student learning
4.67
N<5
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
N<5
men
white
asian
white
N/A
Discussions of grad student learning
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Discussions of effective teaching practices
4.39
N<5
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
N<5
men
 
asian
white
N/A
Discussions of effective use of technology
4.00
N<5
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
N<5
men
foc
asian
white
N/A
Discussions of current research methods
3.25
N<5
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
N<5
men
foc
asian
 
N/A
Amount of professional interaction w/Pre-tenure
3.81
N<5
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
N<5
 
foc
asian
 
N/A
Amount of professional interaction w/Tenured
3.60
N<5
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
N<5
men
 
asian
white
N/A
Departmental Quality
3.80
N<5
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
N<5
men
white
 
white
N/A
Intellectual vitality of tenured faculty
3.91
N<5
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
N<5
men
white
white
white
N/A
Intellectual vitality of pre-tenure faculty
4.17
N<5
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
N<5
men
 
 
 
N/A
Scholarly productivity of tenured faculty
3.69
N<5
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
N<5
men
white
 
white
N/A
Scholarly productivity of pre-tenure faculty
4.03
N<5
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
N<5
men
white
white
white
N/A
Teaching effectiveness of tenured faculty
3.76
N<5
N<5
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
N<5
men
foc
N<5
 
N/A
Teaching effectiveness of pre-tenure faculty
4.03
N<5
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
N<5
men
 
asian
 
N/A
Dept. is successful at faculty recruitment
3.80
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N/A
Dept. is successful at faculty retention
3.60
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N/A
Dept. addresses sub-standard performance
2.37
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
N<5
men
white
N<5
white
N/A
Related Survey Items
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Intellectual vitality of NTT faculty
3.92
N<5
N<5
tenured
N<5
N<5
men
white
white
white
N/A
Scholarly productivity of NTT faculty
3.68
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
men
white
N<5
white
N/A
Teaching effectiveness of NTT faculty
3.77
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
N<5
N<5
men
 
N<5
white
N/A
Amount of professional interaction w/NTT
3.46
N<5
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
N<5
 
white
asian
white
N/A
Amount of personal interaction w/NTT
3.47
N<5
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
N<5
men
white
white
white
N/A
Recruiting part-time faculty
3.33
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
tenured
N<5
N<5
women
white
N<5
N<5
N/A
Managing part-time faculty
2.82
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
tenured
N<5
N<5
women
foc
N<5
N<5
N/A